PortfoliosLab logo
^TYX vs. GC=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^TYX and GC=F is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

^TYX vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 30 Years (^TYX) and Gold (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^TYX:

0.41

GC=F:

1.95

Sortino Ratio

^TYX:

0.79

GC=F:

2.54

Omega Ratio

^TYX:

1.09

GC=F:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

^TYX:

0.17

GC=F:

4.42

Martin Ratio

^TYX:

1.10

GC=F:

11.33

Ulcer Index

^TYX:

7.81%

GC=F:

3.12%

Daily Std Dev

^TYX:

19.06%

GC=F:

18.13%

Max Drawdown

^TYX:

-88.52%

GC=F:

-44.36%

Current Drawdown

^TYX:

-39.12%

GC=F:

-6.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TYX achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 21.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ^TYX has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 5.31%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 10.04% annualized return.


^TYX

YTD

3.78%

1M

3.52%

6M

7.12%

1Y

8.12%

5Y*

29.72%

10Y*

5.31%

GC=F

YTD

21.15%

1M

-0.61%

6M

23.42%

1Y

35.34%

5Y*

12.70%

10Y*

10.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^TYX vs. GC=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TYX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^TYX is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^TYX is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^TYX is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^TYX is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^TYX is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^TYX is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GC=F is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^TYX vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 30 Years (^TYX) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^TYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TYX and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

^TYX vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TYX drawdown since its inception was -88.52%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TYX and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

^TYX vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Treasury Yield 30 Years (^TYX) is 4.63%, while Gold (GC=F) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that ^TYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...